Friday, October 18, 2013

Shriners, Global Warming, and the Trilateral Commission

A symbol representing the origin of their ancient pagan roots. Note the crescent moon and star borrowed from Islam. 
This is worship of the moon god.

Not much is said about the Shriners in our country, but they are a fraternity of Freemasonry. In order to become a Shriner, the member must have completed 33 degrees of Masonry. By the time they work their way up to the highest levels of Masonry, they are fully indoctrinated Luciferians.

Barry Goldwater (far right)[1]

One well known political figure was a Shriner. His name was Barry Goldwater, and he was the the Republican Party's nominee for president in the 1964 election. His allegiance to the 'god of this world' and the future of Third Way Communitarianism, can be seen in the way he fought against the increasing influence of the Christian Right on the Republican Party. He became a vocal opponent of the Religious Right on issues such as abortion, gay rights, and the role of religion in public life, although the Republican Party has been able to rally most Christians into their camp.

For example, Goldwater once said:
"The big thing is to make this country, along with every other country in the world with a few exceptions, quit discriminating against people just because they're gay. You don't have to agree with it, but they have a constitutional right to be gay. And that's what brings me into it."  [2]
He is right about that. Our country was founded by Deists and Universalists to worship a supreme being, not the Lord Jesus Christ. They worship Lucifer, the Lightbearer, and they are part of a Masonic hellbound cult.

"Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil, who put darkness for light, and light for darkness.” Isaiah 5:20

If Christians had a reality check, they would see that our countries founding was based on an anti-Biblical Masonic foundation, and it is the prototype for the One World Religion.  (see Ephesians 5:11 blog) 

"Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds." 2 John 1:9-11

An Inside Job
Barry Goldwater was privy to the true founding and direction of our country - to take a lead in the future world government. In this telling quote about one of the strands of Satan's evil web, Goldwater said:

In so many words, Goldwater's quote had to do with Capitalist restructuring and globalism for the Third Way. The symbol for the Trilateral Commission has an interesting origin, but perhaps the three arrows also reflect a Third Way. It's all one in the same.

It tends to remind you of the recycling logo - another link of in the chain of our false reality. Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev once said:

"The environmental crisis is the cornerstone for the New World Order."[4][5] 

It's just more proof that we are caught in a Luciferian web of deception.

"He [Satan] was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." John 8:44

"...until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ: Which in his times he shall shew, who is the blessed and only Potentate [ruler], the King of kings, and Lord of lords;" 1 Timothy 6:14,15

Related Posts
Global Warming: Mikhail Gorbachev and Maurice Strong's Trojan Horse
Lies of Democracy - Part 1
Lies of Democracy - Part 2
World Democracy or World Dictatorship?
Communitarianism: Collectivist Values in Transition
The Christian Right and the Nazi Underground
Interdependence: The Wrong Solution, a Bad Idea

Monday, October 14, 2013

The World Food Prize and the U.N.'s Evil Agenda

A worldwide prize has been given to three GMO executives for their achievements that contributed to  advanced human development by improving the quality, quantity or availability of food in the world - or so they say.[1] The World Food Prize is awarded yearly at the World Food Prize Laureate Award Ceremony around October 16, which is also known as the United Nations World Food Day. The theme for 2013 is "Sustainable Food Systems for Food Security and Nutrition."[2]

The US State Department announced in June that the $250,000 World Food Prize for 2013 will be shared by three scientists, turned chemical company executives, who pioneered the development of genetically modified organisms, GMOs. The winners are:  Marc Van Montagu of Belgium, and Mary-Dell Chilton and Robert T. Fraley of the United States. Robert Fraley is Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer at Monsanto, and Mary-Dell Chilton is Distinguished Science Fellow at Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. For those of you who don't know, Syngenta Biotechnology is a Swiss-based company that has been blamed for massive bee die-offs. It is interesting to note that Monsanto and Syngenta are both listed as sponsors of the award on the World Food Prize website.[3]

Critics of GMOs marched Saturday, October 15, 2013, in front of the World Food Prize building to protest the controversial awarding of this year’s prize to laureates who have devised ways to put foreign genes into a plant’s DNA. The March Against Monsanto was the kick-off to a week of Occupy World Food Prize events coinciding with the annual Iowa award. It has been called the Nobel Prize of Agriculture, and was founded by Dr. Normal Borlaug[4] who is also known as one of the fathers of the Green Revolution.

As the United Nations and World Food Prize make it appear that GMOs are a good thing, they have been 
banned to varying degrees in Austria, Bulgaria, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Japan, Luxembourg, Madeira, New Zealand, Peru, Russia, France, Switzerland and Costa Rica. GMOs are labeled in 62 countries, but not the U.S. despite several attempts.

The Big Set-up
GMOs and their corporate profits are being advanced at the safety and expense of mankind. But at the same time, the unaware should note how the solution to this food safety issue is being handled, since it is also attributing to the same hidden objectives of the GMO corporate executives.

Food justice activists view the solution to fighting against GMOs, and their manufacturers, by transitioning toward locally grown foods. The fact that is often overlooked is that the United Nations also supports these efforts. So as they promote GMOs as being the solution to world hunger, and they also support the local small farm movement as the solution to climate change. Do you see the inconsistencies? They are doing this because they are one in the same.

Based on UN documents, the their sustainable food system will resemble a neo-feudal food plan.
Neo-feudalism - The phenomenon of corporations taking control of cultures and individuals through money, policies, practices, and gatekeeping in general, to the point that they control many aspects of everyday private life.[5]
When the Agenda 21 and GMO plans are fully in place, the rural areas in America will serve the cities with food. Corporate-government Communitarian laws are being put in place to control every aspect of local, regional, national and international rules, and regulations for food production and sale, including food quality, safety, and industry. They don't have our interests at heart, and there is nothing free about the new food system.

The part the Communitarian totalitarians don't tell their followers is that by the year 2020, 20% of our foods will be locally grown; then 50% by the year 2050.[6] Rural areas will be converted to farm lands to serve the cities. There is a reason our country went to large scale farming. This sounds more like a plan for starvation.[7]

A global crisis is being precipitated by Satan's world leaders. Out of this crisis will come the opportunity for a New Age [Aquarian] kingdom to be realized. Our future global food system is only part of that control grid, since he that controls food controls the world.

 A political Zionist, a 33rd Degree Mason, and supporter of the World Food Prize. His family eats organic, 
and he supports local and organic food.

"Beloved, follow not that which is evil, but that which is good. He that doeth good is of God: 
but he that doeth evil hath not seen God." 3 John 1:11

"Evil men understand not judgment: but they that seek the LORD understand all things." Prov. 28:5

Important Related Post
Food Justice: The Communitarians Neo-Feudal Food Plan
Transition to Communitarianism: Community Growing
Food Justice: The Global Hegelian Dialectic
Communitarian 'Common Ground' Community Gardens

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Rotten to the Common Core

by Matt Shipley
Canada Free Press (Bio and Archives)
Used with Permission
Videos and clipart added

Common Core, an education program developed with funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to improve academic standards in public schools, will fall far short of its stated objective.

Its promoters tout it to be a “state-led effort to establish a single set of clear educational standards for English-language arts and mathematics…” to provide teachers, parents and students with a set of well defined expectations and “[h]igh standards that are consistent across states…

Underlying these statements is the proposition public schools are not performing very well or completely failing to educate students to a necessary standard.

Based on the fact SAT scores, since 1962, have twice been adjusted downward to artificially depict higher scores among students taking the exam but have continued to decline and national literacy scores continue to decline as a percentage of the United States population it is difficult to refute the dysfunctional public school proposition. Their solution to this very real problem, however, is like putting a gangrene infected band aid on a gangrenous open wound.

Common Core is just another Johnny-come-lately, one-size-fits-all national standard that attempts to fix a problem created by the original national standard; our public school system.

America’s modern public school system is the manifestation of its founder’s vision, the father of American public education, Horace Mann. Horace Mann, a Unitarian Massachusetts school board member in the 1840s, wrote twelve annual reports on public education that was to become the foundation of every public school in America. Mann [a Freemason] prototyped his “Common Schools” in his reports on the Prussian school system.

Prussia was the first European state to institute public schools, from which every other country in Europe modeled their public schools. So it is no coincidence Mann modeled his “Common Schools” off the ones he observed in Prussia while visiting schools in Europe. Neither is it a coincidence Prussia, known for its autocratic and dictatorial society that ultimately unified the other German states under its control, would impose an uncompromising uniform standard upon its population.

In his seventh report, Mann ironically claimed, “we do not desire to copy or to study the systems of foreign nations, usually so different from our own,” but then he went on to say “surely we may copy his [the Prussian school system’s] modes of teaching these elements, without adopting his notions of passive obedience to the government[.]” Evidence of Mann’s lack of success in adopting the Prussian model without instituting its passive obedience to the government is found in America’s modern myopic obedience to the national government.

(YouTube link)

That America has become passively obedient to the national government can be seen throughout the 20th and the 21st Century in that Americans sit passively by or actively cheer when: Congress passes laws violating the Constitution, Presidents exceed their limited authority by issuing orders not supported by any law passed by Congress and the Supreme Court, when asked to interpose on behalf of we the people, uphold these things through the most ridiculous, convoluted, humanistic and illogical arguments a human mind can conjure. One only need compare the grievances listed in the Declaration of Independence to similar modern occurrences to see contemporary American society does not have the political will of its forefathers.

For America, that was founded on and has celebrated its diversity of ideas, extensive government control and standardization of any kind seems counter intuitive. The framers of the Constitution were careful to preserve the independence of the States by only delegating finite powers to the national government. This allowed the citizens of each State to preserve their cultural diversity and pursue their own happiness.

Now, control over students in what and how they learn has been institutionalized in America by Mann via public schools. Mann, through his Common School system, was able to undo what so many sacrificed in the War of Independence to acquire and the founders carefully guarded in both the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. This centralized control over public school students continues to grow and its latest adaptation is the voluntarily imposed Common Core curriculum.

Strips parental oversight of what children should be taught 
Common Core is rotten to the core, because no one can justify its expense by any potential gains in scholastic improvement, it strips parental oversight of what children should be taught, and it is a one-size-fits-all program that will not serve any child to their maximum potential.

First, according to the Pioneer Institute and the American Principles Project, which conducted a state by state comprehensive cost analysis[1] of implementing Common Core, in Pennsylvania alone the extra cost of implementation was estimated to be $645 million. As of January 2012, Pennsylvania was set to receive only $40 million in Obama’s Race to the Top funds, which were contingent upon adoption of Common Core standards, student Longitudinal data collection, and a teacher evaluation program.

(YouTube link
) Start at 3:45

Adding this up, for the adoption of a national standard, Pennsylvania might receive up to 6% of the extra costs from the government, but will have to foot the bill for over a half a billion dollars on their own. None of this makes fiscal sense when considering if Pennsylvania did not adopt any other new program their education costs would remain relatively constant.

Second, if parents allow the government or any other entity to dictate how their children must be educated or what they must learn, the parents might as well just give their children to the government or entity to raise. Even now, parents have limited control over what children are taught in public schools and everyone has to pay for public schools whether they have children or not. Common Core will add more of the same to an already burdensome tax system through another layer of bureaucracy whose standards, if history is any indication, have limited hope of being achieved.

Third, children are not ginger bread men to be cut out of common dough; they are unique individuals with unique learning talents, interests and needs. A common standard may fit everyone, but it will not fit anyone very well and its results will be as disappointing as the results from the public schools system, which the program is intended to fix.

Furthermore, children in America do not belong to any government, community, business, or labor consortium. They belong to their parents and to them alone. Parents, therefore, must decide the values, morals and information from which their children will most benefit to live in society. To abdicate this responsibility is to allow someone else to make decisions that will not always be to the benefit of the children or the parents.

Like every other aspect of life, the Bible provides guidance on whose responsibility it is to teach children. Any government; national, State, or local that dictates what children must be taught and extorts money through taxation to pay for their vision has overstepped the bounds of their biblical jurisdiction. Romans 13:3-5 describes the purpose of government: to wield the sword of justice against evil doers, but nowhere in the Bible will you find education as one of its functions.

In Proverbs 22:6, one will find the Bible giving responsibility of a child’s education to parents. The Bible also states in Proverbs 1:7, “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge,” and since public schools have completely pushed Christ out of the classroom it is no wonder their academic performance has gone with Him.

Mann’s utopian pursuit of standardized universal “free education” was the European totalitarian bridgehead into America and it has turned into the coercive failed public school system America has today. Like all utopias, the only way to achieve them is through coercion.

This coercion is nearly absent from non-publicly funded schools and these schools most always cost less to operate and produce better educational results in nearly every measurable way than their publicly funded counterparts. A 1997 study[2] found home schooled children, on the average, outperformed their public school counterparts by 30 to 37 percentile points on all subjects. These findings were further supported by Dr. Lawrence Rudner who found children that were homeschooled all their school aged years had the highest academic achievement.

Since uniformity and top down imposed standards have not worked, the solution to deteriorating performance in America’s public schools is simple, return responsibility for education to parents by defunding public schools and restoring parents’ right to decide where and how to educate their children.

Some may argue defunding public schools would deprive many “under privileged” children of an education, but considering what they receive now, it might actually be an improvement. Besides, violation of property rights, through taxation for public schools, or any other violation of the rights specifically mentioned in the Declaration of Independence is never justified, no matter how noble the cause. Additionally, it is an individual’s responsibility to be charitable to the under privileged, because when a government does it through taxation it is called theft or extortion, not charity.

Much of the resistance to defunding public schools comes from the fact most people living today, who grew up in America, are a product of a public school, have known no other system of education, and cannot imagine how another system would work. Those who think this way are oblivious to the fact that prior to 1840, all American schools were non-public, biblically based, and produced the founding culture, which in turn established the most successful nation in the history of the world. The secularized standardization of Common Core, by contrast, is rotten to the core just like the seed of “Common Schools” from which it was germinated that produced the culture who voted for the politicians America has today. If people were to take the time to compare the results of the two systems they too would see for themselves what Mann has done to education.

[1] Pioneer Institute and American Principles Project, National Costs to Aligning States and Localities to the Common Core Standards, No 82, February 2012.
[2] Dr. Brian Ray, Strengths of Their Own: Home Schoolers Across America.

Additional Comments: Common Core teaches the ideology of communitarianism, and it is directly affiliated with the United Nations. Attempts are going to be made to make Common Core go away, but as you will see - it was designed to stay.

The UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) has a program called Education for All that includes the same people and same ideas as Common Core. The Global Fund for Education was formulated by the UN, “agreed to” by Barack Obama, funded by Bill Gates, and Common Core was imposed on the American people through Department of Education (DOE) funding schemes.[3]

It is interesting to note that John Dewey has gotten most of the credit for being the Father of Public Education. Perhaps the reason why Horace Mann's contribution isn't as well known is because of the connection to Germany.

The article above gives important details on how and why our public school system evolved. Please watch the following video, since it will give you the big picture and the end game.

(YouTube link)

Additional viewing (Not an endorsement)

Related Posts
Common Core and the Communitarian World Government
Communitarianism: In Transition to Collectivist Values  
Charter Schools: The One World Classroom