Thursday, April 25, 2013

UN Creates New, More Powerful Global Environmental Agency

Logo is similar to the happy human symbol of humanism.

Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
May 27, 2012
In June of this year, at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, the United Nations (UN) will push for the expansion of their new and improved global environmental agency.

The UN Environmental Program (UNEP) will be promoted to “specialized agency” with a new title, UN Environment Organization (UNEO).

The UNEO will prop up the Sustainable Development division of the UN. The same agency that disseminates Agenda 21 policies to governments will be centralized into a global agency with powerful international backing.

As the unscientific assertions of a global environmental crisis, vanishing biodiversity and over-population become more “urgent” to the UN; the insertion of international governance is being covertly added into the mix as the answer to solve all problems worldwide.

Through treaties, agreements and institutions, reformation of the UN within the UN has yielded quite a response.

Ban Ki-moon, UN Secretary General devised the global sustainability panel that includes more than 50 supporters of the creation of UNEO.

“One option is the possible transformation of UNEP into a specialized agency of the United Nations. A strengthened UNEP could enhance coherence between relevant multilateral environmental agreements, and better integrate its work with the activities of development institutions, especially the United Nations Development Program,” states one recommendation.

The UN is changing the status of the “program” to an “agency” to demand more funding for its initiatives; as well as receives more power and autonomy.

Although UNEO is slated to be funded entirely by voluntary donation, “assessed contributions” could be allocated to the agency on the basis of success and necessity.

Specialized agencies within the UN receive these “assessed contributions” by member states as derived from factors such as national income and gross domestic product.

The more the country can afford, the more the UN takes to fund their international directives. One way of directing funds to the UN is through the usurpation of innovative technologies for the sake of “saving the planet”. There is a call for development and manufacturing of greenhouse safe products; however the allocation of funding toward research for finding a way to mitigate or even stop climate change effects seems to be left out.(Continue reading)