Shriners, Global Warming, and the Trilateral Commission

A symbol representing the origin of their ancient pagan roots. Note the crescent moon and star borrowed from Islam. 
This is worship of the moon god.

Not much is said about the Shriners in our country, but they are a fraternity of Freemasonry. In order to become a Shriner, the member must have completed 33 degrees of Masonry. By the time they work their way up to the highest levels of Masonry, they are fully indoctrinated Luciferians.

Barry Goldwater (far right)[1]

One well known political figure was a Shriner. His name was Barry Goldwater, and he was the the Republican Party's nominee for president in the 1964 election. His allegiance to the 'god of this world' and the future of Third Way Communitarianism, can be seen in the way he fought against the increasing influence of the Christian Right on the Republican Party. He became a vocal opponent of the Religious Right on issues such as abortion, gay rights, and the role of religion in public life, although the Republican Party has been able to rally most Christians into their camp.

For example, Goldwater once said:

"The big thing is to make this country, along with every other country in the world with a few exceptions, quit discriminating against people just because they're gay. You don't have to agree with it, but they have a constitutional right to be gay. And that's what brings me into it."  [2]

He is right about that. Our country was founded by Deists and Universalists to worship a supreme being, not the Lord Jesus Christ. They worship Lucifer, the Lightbearer, and they are part of a Masonic hellbound cult.

"Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil, who put darkness for light, and light for darkness.” Isaiah 5:20

If Christians had a reality check, they would see that our countries founding was based on an anti-Biblical Masonic foundation, and it is the prototype for the One World Religion.  (see Ephesians 5:11 blog) 

"Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds." 2 John 1:9-11

An Inside Job
Barry Goldwater was privy to the true founding and direction of our country - to take a lead in the future world government. In this telling quote about one of the strands of Satan's evil web, Goldwater said:

In so many words, Goldwater's quote had to do with Capitalist restructuring and globalism for the Third Way. The symbol for the Trilateral Commission has an interesting origin, but perhaps the three arrows also reflect a Third Way. It's all one in the same.

It tends to remind you of the recycling logo - another link of in the chain of our false reality. Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev once said:

"The environmental crisis is the cornerstone for the New World Order."[4][5] 

It's just more proof that we are caught in a Luciferian web of deception.

"He [Satan] was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." John 8:44

"...until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ: Which in his times he shall shew, who is the blessed and only Potentate [ruler], the King of kings, and Lord of lords;" 1 Timothy 6:14,15

Related Posts
Global Warming: Mikhail Gorbachev and Maurice Strong's Trojan Horse
Lies of Democracy - Part 1
Lies of Democracy - Part 2
World Democracy or World Dictatorship?
Communitarianism: Collectivist Values in Transition
The Christian Right and the Nazi Underground
Interdependence: The Wrong Solution, a Bad Idea

The World Food Prize and the U.N.'s Evil Agenda

A worldwide prize has been given to three GMO executives for their achievements that contributed to  advanced human development by improving the quality, quantity or availability of food in the world - or so they say.[1] The World Food Prize is awarded yearly at the World Food Prize Laureate Award Ceremony around October 16, which is also known as the United Nations World Food Day. The theme for 2013 is "Sustainable Food Systems for Food Security and Nutrition."[2]

The US State Department announced in June that the $250,000 World Food Prize for 2013 will be shared by three scientists, turned chemical company executives, who pioneered the development of genetically modified organisms, GMOs. The winners are:  Marc Van Montagu of Belgium, and Mary-Dell Chilton and Robert T. Fraley of the United States. Robert Fraley is Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer at Monsanto, and Mary-Dell Chilton is Distinguished Science Fellow at Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. For those of you who don't know, Syngenta Biotechnology is a Swiss-based company that has been blamed for massive bee die-offs. It is interesting to note that Monsanto and Syngenta are both listed as sponsors of the award on the World Food Prize website.[3]

Critics of GMOs marched Saturday, October 15, 2013, in front of the World Food Prize building to protest the controversial awarding of this year’s prize to laureates who have devised ways to put foreign genes into a plant’s DNA. The March Against Monsanto was the kick-off to a week of Occupy World Food Prize events coinciding with the annual Iowa award. It has been called the Nobel Prize of Agriculture, and was founded by Dr. Normal Borlaug[4] who is also known as one of the fathers of the Green Revolution.

As the United Nations and World Food Prize make it appear that GMOs are a good thing, they have been 
banned to varying degrees in Austria, Bulgaria, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Japan, Luxembourg, Madeira, New Zealand, Peru, Russia, France, Switzerland and Costa Rica. GMOs are labeled in 62 countries, but not the U.S. despite several attempts.

The Big Set-up
GMOs and their corporate profits are being advanced at the safety and expense of mankind. But at the same time, the unaware should note how the solution to this food safety issue is being handled, since it is also attributing to the same hidden objectives of the GMO corporate executives.

Food justice activists view the solution to fighting against GMOs, and their manufacturers, by transitioning toward locally grown foods. The fact that is often overlooked is that the United Nations also supports these efforts. So as they promote GMOs as being the solution to world hunger, and they also support the local small farm movement as the solution to climate change. Do you see the inconsistencies? They are doing this because they are one in the same.

Based on UN documents, the their sustainable food system will resemble a neo-feudal food plan.

Neo-feudalism - The phenomenon of corporations taking control of cultures and individuals through money, policies, practices, and gatekeeping in general, to the point that they control many aspects of everyday private life.[5]

When the Agenda 21 and GMO plans are fully in place, the rural areas in America will serve the cities with food. Corporate-government Communitarian laws are being put in place to control every aspect of local, regional, national and international rules, and regulations for food production and sale, including food quality, safety, and industry. They don't have our interests at heart, and there is nothing free about the new food system.

The part the Communitarian totalitarians don't tell their followers is that by the year 2020, 20% of our foods will be locally grown; then 50% by the year 2050.[6] Rural areas will be converted to farm lands to serve the cities. There is a reason our country went to large scale farming. This sounds more like a plan for starvation.[7]

A global crisis is being precipitated by Satan's world leaders. Out of this crisis will come the opportunity for a New Age [Aquarian] kingdom to be realized. Our future global food system is only part of that control grid, since he that controls food controls the world.

 A political Zionist, a 33rd Degree Mason, and supporter of the World Food Prize. His family eats organic, 

and he supports local and organic food.

"Beloved, follow not that which is evil, but that which is good. He that doeth good is of God: 

but he that doeth evil hath not seen God." 3 John 1:11

"Evil men understand not judgment: but they that seek the LORD understand all things." Prov. 28:5

Important Related Post
Food Justice: The Communitarians Neo-Feudal Food Plan
Transition to Communitarianism: Community Growing
Food Justice: The Global Hegelian Dialectic
Communitarian 'Common Ground' Community Gardens

Rotten to the Common Core

by Matt Shipley
Canada Free Press (Bio and Archives)
Used with Permission
Videos and clipart added

Common Core, an education program developed with funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to improve academic standards in public schools, will fall far short of its stated objective.

Its promoters tout it to be a “state-led effort to establish a single set of clear educational standards for English-language arts and mathematics…” to provide teachers, parents and students with a set of well defined expectations and “[h]igh standards that are consistent across states…”

Underlying these statements is the proposition public schools are not performing very well or completely failing to educate students to a necessary standard.

Based on the fact SAT scores, since 1962, have twice been adjusted downward to artificially depict higher scores among students taking the exam but have continued to decline and national literacy scores continue to decline as a percentage of the United States population it is difficult to refute the dysfunctional public school proposition. Their solution to this very real problem, however, is like putting a gangrene infected band aid on a gangrenous open wound.

Common Core is just another Johnny-come-lately, one-size-fits-all national standard that attempts to fix a problem created by the original national standard; our public school system.

America’s modern public school system is the manifestation of its founder’s vision, the father of American public education, Horace Mann. Horace Mann, a Unitarian Massachusetts school board member in the 1840s, wrote twelve annual reports on public education that was to become the foundation of every public school in America. Mann [a Freemason] prototyped his “Common Schools” in his reports on the Prussian school system.

Prussia was the first European state to institute public schools, from which every other country in Europe modeled their public schools. So it is no coincidence Mann modeled his “Common Schools” off the ones he observed in Prussia while visiting schools in Europe. Neither is it a coincidence Prussia, known for its autocratic and dictatorial society that ultimately unified the other German states under its control, would impose an uncompromising uniform standard upon its population.

In his seventh report, Mann ironically claimed, “we do not desire to copy or to study the systems of foreign nations, usually so different from our own,” but then he went on to say “surely we may copy his [the Prussian school system’s] modes of teaching these elements, without adopting his notions of passive obedience to the government[.]” Evidence of Mann’s lack of success in adopting the Prussian model without instituting its passive obedience to the government is found in America’s modern myopic obedience to the national government.

(YouTube link)

That America has become passively obedient to the national government can be seen throughout the 20th and the 21st Century in that Americans sit passively by or actively cheer when: Congress passes laws violating the Constitution, Presidents exceed their limited authority by issuing orders not supported by any law passed by Congress and the Supreme Court, when asked to interpose on behalf of we the people, uphold these things through the most ridiculous, convoluted, humanistic and illogical arguments a human mind can conjure. One only need compare the grievances listed in the Declaration of Independence to similar modern occurrences to see contemporary American society does not have the political will of its forefathers.

For America, that was founded on and has celebrated its diversity of ideas, extensive government control and standardization of any kind seems counter intuitive. The framers of the Constitution were careful to preserve the independence of the States by only delegating finite powers to the national government. This allowed the citizens of each State to preserve their cultural diversity and pursue their own happiness.

Now, control over students in what and how they learn has been institutionalized in America by Mann via public schools. Mann, through his Common School system, was able to undo what so many sacrificed in the War of Independence to acquire and the founders carefully guarded in both the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. This centralized control over public school students continues to grow and its latest adaptation is the voluntarily imposed Common Core curriculum.

Strips parental oversight of what children should be taught 
Common Core is rotten to the core, because no one can justify its expense by any potential gains in scholastic improvement, it strips parental oversight of what children should be taught, and it is a one-size-fits-all program that will not serve any child to their maximum potential.

First, according to the Pioneer Institute and the American Principles Project, which conducted a state by state comprehensive cost analysis[1] of implementing Common Core, in Pennsylvania alone the extra cost of implementation was estimated to be $645 million. As of January 2012, Pennsylvania was set to receive only $40 million in Obama’s Race to the Top funds, which were contingent upon adoption of Common Core standards, student Longitudinal data collection, and a teacher evaluation program.

(
(YouTube link) Start at 3:45

Adding this up, for the adoption of a national standard, Pennsylvania might receive up to 6% of the extra costs from the government, but will have to foot the bill for over a half a billion dollars on their own. None of this makes fiscal sense when considering if Pennsylvania did not adopt any other new program their education costs would remain relatively constant.

Second, if parents allow the government or any other entity to dictate how their children must be educated or what they must learn, the parents might as well just give their children to the government or entity to raise. Even now, parents have limited control over what children are taught in public schools and everyone has to pay for public schools whether they have children or not. Common Core will add more of the same to an already burdensome tax system through another layer of bureaucracy whose standards, if history is any indication, have limited hope of being achieved.

Third, children are not ginger bread men to be cut out of common dough; they are unique individuals with unique learning talents, interests and needs. A common standard may fit everyone, but it will not fit anyone very well and its results will be as disappointing as the results from the public schools system, which the program is intended to fix.

Furthermore, children in America do not belong to any government, community, business, or labor consortium. They belong to their parents and to them alone. Parents, therefore, must decide the values, morals and information from which their children will most benefit to live in society. To abdicate this responsibility is to allow someone else to make decisions that will not always be to the benefit of the children or the parents.

Like every other aspect of life, the Bible provides guidance on whose responsibility it is to teach children. Any government; national, State, or local that dictates what children must be taught and extorts money through taxation to pay for their vision has overstepped the bounds of their biblical jurisdiction. Romans 13:3-5 describes the purpose of government: to wield the sword of justice against evil doers, but nowhere in the Bible will you find education as one of its functions.

In Proverbs 22:6, one will find the Bible giving responsibility of a child’s education to parents. The Bible also states in Proverbs 1:7, “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge,” and since public schools have completely pushed Christ out of the classroom it is no wonder their academic performance has gone with Him.

Mann’s utopian pursuit of standardized universal “free education” was the European totalitarian bridgehead into America and it has turned into the coercive failed public school system America has today. Like all utopias, the only way to achieve them is through coercion.

This coercion is nearly absent from non-publicly funded schools and these schools most always cost less to operate and produce better educational results in nearly every measurable way than their publicly funded counterparts. A 1997 study[2] found home schooled children, on the average, outperformed their public school counterparts by 30 to 37 percentile points on all subjects. These findings were further supported by Dr. Lawrence Rudner who found children that were homeschooled all their school aged years had the highest academic achievement.

Since uniformity and top down imposed standards have not worked, the solution to deteriorating performance in America’s public schools is simple, return responsibility for education to parents by defunding public schools and restoring parents’ right to decide where and how to educate their children.

Some may argue defunding public schools would deprive many “under privileged” children of an education, but considering what they receive now, it might actually be an improvement. Besides, violation of property rights, through taxation for public schools, or any other violation of the rights specifically mentioned in the Declaration of Independence is never justified, no matter how noble the cause. Additionally, it is an individual’s responsibility to be charitable to the under privileged, because when a government does it through taxation it is called theft or extortion, not charity.

Much of the resistance to defunding public schools comes from the fact most people living today, who grew up in America, are a product of a public school, have known no other system of education, and cannot imagine how another system would work. Those who think this way are oblivious to the fact that prior to 1840, all American schools were non-public, biblically based, and produced the founding culture, which in turn established the most successful nation in the history of the world. The secularized standardization of Common Core, by contrast, is rotten to the core just like the seed of “Common Schools” from which it was germinated that produced the culture who voted for the politicians America has today. If people were to take the time to compare the results of the two systems they too would see for themselves what Mann has done to education.

[1] Pioneer Institute and American Principles Project, National Costs to Aligning States and Localities to the Common Core Standards, No 82, February 2012.
[2] Dr. Brian Ray, Strengths of Their Own: Home Schoolers Across America.

Additional Comments: Common Core teaches the ideology of communitarianism, and it is directly affiliated with the United Nations. Attempts are going to be made to make Common Core go away, but as you will see - it was designed to stay.

The UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) has a program called “Education for All” that includes the same people and same ideas as Common Core. The Global Fund for Education was formulated by the UN, “agreed to” by Barack Obama, funded by Bill Gates, and Common Core was imposed on the American people through Department of Education (DOE) funding schemes.[3]

It is interesting to note that John Dewey has gotten most of the credit for being the Father of Public Education. Perhaps the reason why Horace Mann's contribution isn't as well known is because of the connection to Germany.

The article above gives important details on how and why our public school system evolved. Please watch the following video, since it will give you the big picture and the end game.


 
(YouTube link)


Additional viewing (Not an endorsement)

Related Posts
Common Core and the Communitarian World Government
Communitarianism: In Transition to Collectivist Values  
Charter Schools: The One World Classroom

The Hands and Feet of Christ and the Identifying Marks of a Communitarian Social Justice Agenda

The Church on a Mission
 

 

Churches build community within groups, and in turn they perform service projects that reach into the surrounding community. Based on the service/volunteerism of the group, the church becomes a hub for the community. As a strategy of change agents, the Church is on a "mission from God" that has become the friendly face that is creating a good society, which will unknowingly facilitate the transition of Christians and churches into the collectivist mindset for the New World Order.

The hands represent the interconnectedness of the group, and unity in diversity - also seen in many churches. Ironically the ministry photo from the top of the post, parallels Amitai Etzioni's book cover. He's the founder of the Communitarian Network, and teaches the Third Way political concepts of the good society. Unfortunately, his ideas have proven to be totalitarian.

At the Root of Volunteerism
Volunteerism is an integral part of Communitarianism. It is part of being a good citizen. Based on the writings of Amitai Etzioni's Communitarian Network, the following statement describes how volunteerism fits into the community:

"National and local service, as well as volunteer work, is desirable to build and express a civil commitment. Such activities, bringing together people from different backgrounds and enabling and encouraging them to work together, build community and foster mutual respect and tolerance."[1]

Their logic is that you need to build community in order to create a collective mindset. Creating a collective mindset eliminates individualism, which is what America's social-political ideals were built upon. Collectivism is the basis for Karl Marx's Socialist/Communist philosophy. In collectivism, the group consensus comes first over one's personal ambitions. Wikipedia states that:

"Collectivism is any philosophic, political, religious, economic, or social outlook that emphasizes the interdependence of every human.[2] The term interdependence in the Communist Manifesto (1848) in describing the universal interdependence of nations in comparison to the old local and national seclusion of independence and self-sufficiency.[3]

Marx and Engel's social relationships and processes are associated with Feudalism, including the interdependence of church and state, and the economic interdependence of families. Coincidentally, Feudalism is a system that is interconnected and interdependent, as you see below.[4]

Realizing that these concepts lead to Communism, note what this U.N. representative said about unity in Diversity and interconnectedness:

 "...the highest possible attainment of a civilization, a testimony to the most noble possibilities of the human race. This attainment is made possible through passionate concern for choice, in an atmosphere of social trust." Michael Novak, former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Human Rights Commission [5]

Interdependence, unity in diversity, and interconnectedness are New Age/occult concepts that are taught in Theosophy. The Theosophical Society promotes the following:

"An essential principle of theosophy is its concept of a holistic world view which emphasizes the unity and interconnectedness of all life, the basic oneness of all people and all species of life. Its  philosophy points to a divine spark in each of us that is always part of the Source from which it arises."

These three teachings are being used to bring in the single authoritarian government. Take note of this statement from the UNESCO website. When following the link, you will see that all these concepts are there. It is man's solution to peace - which skirts around the true solution for peace:

 Today, sustainable development calls to rethink our relationship to the economy, to society and the environment, bearing in mind that the emerging and future challenges of humankind do require collective responses, which implies the kind of solidarity that can result only from a culture of peace, non-violence and dialogue which condenses “that which binds” cultures and societies to each other and from within. In turn, a culture of peace fosters sustainable development since it is aimed at helping people cope resiliently and creatively with ethical, cultural, political, environmental and other social transformations.

True peace is not the lack of conflict between men, but the lack of conflict between men and God. God has given us the solution to human conflict and that solution is the person of Christ Jesus. There is only one “roadmap to peace” and it is the path with Jesus.[6]

If you have been a Christian for any length of time, you would know that Antichrist will come in peaceably on a platform of peace, prosperity, and safety for all nations and all religions - deceiving the majority. Satan has cleverly uses doctrines of demons to get the church on board with cleverly disguised global and community missional goals to assist the Enemy in securing the world for his purposes. Even the overemphasis of the teaching on love - it all plays a part of the elimination of intolerance, so that proponents can bring about civic cooperation, create responsibilities, and achieve common good for the community/world.[7] 

The Purpose of the Church  
Within the last decade, the corporate church has created a new mission for the Church - to be the hands and feet of Christ. The Purpose Driven and Emergent/Missional churches have used 1 Cor. 12:12-26 to create an unified Christian workforce for the world. Please read closely:

"For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ. For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit. For the body is not one member, but many. If the foot shall say, Because I am not the hand, I am not of the body; is it therefore not of the body? And if the ear shall say, Because I am not the eye, I am not of the body; is it therefore not of the body? If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where were the smelling? But now hath God set the members every one of them in the body, as it hath pleased him. And if they were all one member, where were the body? But now are they many members, yet but one body. And the eye cannot say unto the hand, I have no need of thee: nor again the head to the feet, I have no need of you. Nay, much more those members of the body, which seem to be more feeble, are necessary: And those members of the body, which we think to be less honourable, upon these we bestow more abundant honour; and our uncomely parts have more abundant comeliness. For our comely parts have no need: but God hath tempered the body together, having given more abundant honour to that part which lacked. That there should be no schism in the body; but that the members should have the same care one for another. And whether one member suffer, all the members suffer with it; or one member be honoured, all the members rejoice with it."

The true meaning of these verses is directed toward genuine believers, so that:

1. Each believer in the Body of Christ will seek unity within the Body, and
2. Each believer has a different spiritual gift, their position within the Body has an important part. 

It does not mean that the Church is to become the volunteer "good works" workforce for the community or some far-off land. If coupled with the Great Commission, it still isn't the correct use of scripture.

The Christian Communist uses several passages to advance their theological and political theory based upon the view that the teachings of Jesus Christ compels Christians to support Communism as the ideal social system. Christ did not support any political system. He merely wanted believers to be connected with one another, and not fly solo. Since it is often times difficult living separate from the world system, He desired us to stick together. He wanted us to encourage one another in love, in spite of our giftings and differences within the Body.

"Bear ye one another's burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ." Gal. 6:2

The modern church now sees fit to assume the key role of managing the transformation of society. That is a far reach from the original intent  for the purpose of the Church.

With the emphasis on the concern for community and social justice issues, this should cause us to question the genuine purpose of the Body of Christ. The Bible says that it is to: worship God (Luke 4:8; John 4:23), study His Word (2 Tim. 2:15), pray (Acts 2:42), love one another (John 13:35), bear one another's burdens (Gal. 6:2), learn how to live as godly people (Titus 2:11-12), for the perfecting of the saints (Eph. 4:12), and to spread the Gospel (Matt. 28:18-20).

Buzz Word: The Use and Meaning of Words
Change agents routinely alter the meaning and use of biblical words and phrases. For instance, the Emergent/Purpose Driven church use of the phrase "the hands and feet of Christ." This phrase actually has two meanings - one true and the other false.

1. The first meaning is used in Gospel outreach. It describes one who goes out to preach the Gospel to an unsaved world headed toward judgment. It is one who reaches their surrounding community through Gospel Mission ministries to the poor, and prison outreach, as they deliver the “good news” that condemned sinners worthy of judgement from God’s wrath, having offended a holy God. It has been used over the years within the Church to emphasize that each individual believer, as they work in ministry, may be the only Jesus the unbelieving world will ever see. It's the basis for lifestyle evangelism, and it can often silently lead people to the Lord. 
2. The second use of the phrase is relatively new. The Purpose Driven, seeker friendly church, is one that improves society. Outside of bettering society, the missional concept has no content; it specifically denies a mission of proclaiming an escape from God’s coming wrath. For the Emergent, “The journey is the reward,” and the journey will certainly end well for all.[8] If it has a Gospel presentation, it's typically a weak one, or no Gospel at all. It mobilizes the unrepentant to good works - to be the hands and feet of Christ.

You can see the contrast in the sermon notes of this popular preacher, who will remain nameless. In his Gospel-driven message,  he says:

"The work of Jesus Christ in the world is in the hands of those who belong to Him. In that sense, Christ has no hands but our hands, no feet but our feet. The Lord commissioned His earthly ministry to His followers, saying, 'Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you (Matt 28:20)'"[9]

The phrase sounds similar to that of the Emergent/Missional church, but this preacher's church has only outreach to their local Gospel Mission, a prison ministry, a local Christian college, and a pastor's training program. He is not flawless, since his church promotes interdependence with government, but it doesn't seem to be promoting social justice missions projects.
 
Now let's look at Rick Warren's writings. In the following quote, Warren was speaking about disaster relief for Hurricane Katrina:

"Disaster presents Christians with unprecedented opportunities to mobilize the Church and become the hands and feet of Christ. We need to become audio-visual Christians – not just talking about it, but doing it." [10]

Straight from Rick Warren's Dominionist plan.[11] What makes it uniquely Communitarian is the interconnectedness of the social, political, and economic sectors.

This reflects the double meaning for 1 Cor. 12: 12-27, and how these are man's idea, not God's. Mobilizing an army of Christian workers is a man thing, not a God thing. This was never seen in the Bible, but is seen in the U.N. Millennium Development Goals - an organization Rick Warren has had close contact with.[12]

Ironically, another famous person used the same concept of service. Teresa of Avila put it like this:

 “Christ has no body now but yours. No hands, no feet on earth but yours. Yours are the eyes through which he looks compassion on this world. Yours are the feet with which he walks to do good. Yours are the hands through which he blesses all the world. Yours are the hands, yours are the feet, yours are the eyes, you are his body. Christ has no body now on earth but yours.”

Teresa of Avila (1515 – 1582) was a prominent Spanish mystic, a Roman Catholic saint, Carmelite nun, liberation theology (Marxist), writer of the Counter Reformation, and involved in contemplative prayer. She wasn't hearing from the Lord, rather from the spirit world.

"Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world." 1 John 4:1

"Thus saith the LORD of hosts, Hearken not unto the words of the prophets that prophesy unto you: they make you vain: they speak a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the LORD." Jeremiah 23:16

Calling a Spade a Spade
What once seemed like a harmless principle on the unity of the Body taught in 1 Cor. 12: 12-27, is now the rallying cry of  the corporate Church. The once clear-cut purpose of the Church has now been molded by change agents to have the elements of  Tony Blair's interfaith Faith Foundation, the Roman Catholic-rooted liberation theology, and Purpose Driven/Emergent church/missional model.

Can you see how the Church has moved from freedom to servitude? Christians are slowly being brainwashed to think like Communists.[13] Some in Christianity have traditionally viewed our service to God as an act of slavery, taking the ancient images of slavery and superimposing them onto modern Christianity. Their is a notion that our normal relationship and service to God should be that of a slave to a master, instead of that of a child of God responding out of love and gratitude to a good God. In reading the following verse, being slaves is not the picture of what Jesus described to us of who we are. He does desire our obedience and service, but it is in our freedom that we do so.

 "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.
Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you. Henceforth I call you not servants; for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth: but I have called you friends; for all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you." John 15:13-15

Leadership Network
Church planting goals, sales tactics, and community "good works" outreach goals sound as though they are biblical, but actually spill over into a goal of reaching the local community with the totalitarian agenda of Communitarianism. They are using the concepts developed by the Leadership Network, whose goal it is to reach your church's global missions program.

 The Leadership Network's logo symbolizes the interconnecting network of feudalism. "The Feudal system had a ruling class who owned all the land and wealth, and provided security and safety to all the serfs. In turn the serfs provided work and servitude to their master. But many people do not realize the collective aspect of how serfs lived together.[14]" 

While watching the video, take note of the "global message," the use of Socialist Peter Drucker's name (founder of the Purpose Driven model), the concern for sustainability, their use of guided solutions, and the desire to change the world.

(YouTube link)

Then there is this video by the Leadership Network. Note as they speak about social justice. I should mention first that the phrase "social justice" was coined by a Jesuit, and "is a part of Catholic social teaching, the Protestants' Social Gospel. It is one of the Four Pillars of the Green Party upheld by green parties worldwide. Social justice is a secular concept, distinct from religious teachings, emerged mainly in the late twentieth century, influenced primarily by philosopher John Rawls. [15]" In case you don't know, the Jesuits lead the counter reformation and the Reconstruction movement of the Roman Catholic Church, and are Dominionists.


(YouTube link)

And this one on community engagement being a mission for God.


(YouTube link)

Service Projects

Community service and Christian service projects are good things to do. Seeing the lives of the lost being touched by these projects is also good. Giving to the poor, needy, and oppressed is called for in the Bible. But we should not be ignorant of the fact that something greater is presently taking place. We should not be reluctant to question the change in the overall mission of the church, and try to see how it fits into the big world picture, even if they mention a generic "God" and say the Gospel is being preached.

Most of us have been taught not to make waves, be compliant, and not question authority, since it is viewed by some to be sinful to disagree. We must understand that there is nothing wrong with questioning what the church experts claim - since they are fully capable of being wrong. Many times this includes how they use scripture.

Communitarian ideology has infiltrated the corporate Church, making it completely acceptable to become servants to the world. As their indoctrinating educational church materials continue to flood the Church, positions will continue to move believers from the socially conservative camp to the Communitarian camp, whether they realize it or not. As long as church members internalize the values of what they are being taught by these fraudulent evangelism experts, they will always fall prey to those who have grander ideas.

Perhaps we should consider these verses about helping the needy.

 "Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven. Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth: That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly."

Could it be that when we help the poor, needy, and oppressed, that we do it in secret? Perhaps we should question whether these open acts of service are to be done on an individual basis among the Body of Christ first, then serving unbelievers who are open to the Gospel, second. Has the church considered that the people in their own congregation may be in need nearly as much as the heathen people in far-off lands? This is just one example of a possible inconsistency in the way we are doing things today in the church. It seems to me that helping those in private shows far more of a heart of compassion than that of an army of follower volunteers. If we are compassionate, we will help them without the group.

Specifics
The following is a list of social justice issues. It is only an excerpt of a greater list from a Catholic university website.

Catholic Social Justice Issues

• Access to food, clean water and shelter 
• Community: promotion of the common good, e.g. education 
• Development of poor countries in an effort to alleviate human misery 
• Dignity of the human person from creation: abortion; euthanasia; the death penalty 
• Family-friendly economic policy—where does the US stand in this regard? 
• Global responsibility for alleviation of economic inequality 
• Human dignity: how poverty affects human rights 
• Marginalization of the poor 
• Pacifism, disarmament 

Children's Rights

• Exploitation of children 
• Child soldiers in Uganda 
• Child workers enslaved on chocolate farms in Ivory Coast 
• Child workers in India 
• Human trafficking – prostitution 
• Right to free education 
• Right to adequate healthcare 
• Rights and their corresponding social responsibilities

Climate Change

• Climate change inequitably impacts developing countries 
• Help is needed to adapt to climate change—technology, policy, etc. 
• Effect of sea level rise to small island nations, e.g.
• Enable the most vulnerable states and populations to become more resilient to climate change by mitigation and adaptation 

Criminal Justice

• Challenges of terrorism: extraordinary rendition, torture and unlawful detention 
• Death penalty / capital punishment 
• Human trafficking 
• Police powers and human rights 
• Prisoners’ rights 
• Racial profiling 

Conclusion
When Christians walk through the doors of a church, they would never anticipate that they would be intentionally deceived by a political agenda, no matter how subtle it is. This is why Communitarianism is so cleverly disguised. It combines the believers desire to spread the good news, alongside the political objective of creating a collectivist mindset. It is truth mixed with lies, and made to appear biblical.

As these church volunteer/service projects continue, allow my words to challenge you in determining  how participating in Christian community projects are part of the globalist/Dominionist/Communitarian plan to transform the world. God's Word was intended to mean something very specific, but change agents have seen the opportunity to manufacture this ingenious plan of the Enemy. Not only does it provide the opportunity to create world socialism, but also a future false great awakening to accept a false messiah figure. It is a conspiracy, and it's real.

It is a global deception...

"The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, 'Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.' He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision." Psalm 2:2-4

...and the Church is participating in it.

"For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works." 2 Cor. 11:13-15

Need I say more.

Related Posts
Christianity Today and the Common Good
Transcendental Meditation vs Contemplative Prayer
The Star of David and the Lasting Impact of Her Harlotry 
Where to Draw the Line with Occult Conspiracy Information
Seven Mountains of the Christian Industrial Complex
The Christian Right and the Nazi Underground
Strengthening Community: The Big Scam
Third Way Politics and Third Way Heresy
Communitarianism: In Transition to Collectivist Values - Part 1
Communitarianism: In Transition to Collectivist Values - Part 2

Common Core and the Communitarian World Government

 The symbol of the spiral is an ancient symbol of the goddess, the womb, fertility, feminine serpent forces, continual change, and the evolution of the universe. The spiral is used in sacred geometry, and probably the oldest symbol of human spirituality and used heavily within the occult.[1]

So far we have heard about Communitarian agendas called Common Purpose, Common Good, and common ground, but now there is another one we have to contend with - Common Core. In a nutshell, Common Core is the nationalization of education, and its got the Gates Foundation fingerprints all over it. President Obama has been the most recent advocate of this globalist method of educating the children of our country/world - equally.

Supporters of the core are saying that the old system of each state having its own set of standards, has  proved to be untenable because student achievement was uneven across the country. Crafters of the system believe it is the first step to a high-quality education [2], yet this Common Core video leaves plenty of information out. Let's listen to what they do want you to know. I'll then go into what has been left out.

(YouTube link)

What they aren't telling you is that personal details about each student are being collected. It's not just about nationalized testing, and having everyone get the same education. It's also about the individuals social security numbers, attendance records, records of interaction with school counselors, identification of learning disabilities, and even disciplinary records. The information communicates more about the student than just grades - the old fashioned way. These changes, made without congressional approval, now allow third party access to student data without the consent of parents. They are neatly incorporated into the students education record.[3]

The other part is that they want the student to learn that their community is a member of a global community. The theme of interdependence and oneness are New Age concepts, and they will be communicated through the curriculum.

Who is supporting this?
According to the Washington Post, both Republicans and Democrats supported the initial initiative, but it has now been receiving opposition from Republicans. The initiative was introduced as being voluntary, but then the true plan was revealed at a later date. After studying Common Core, it violates states rights. You would think that a curriculum that requires the implementation of the standardization of education across the country would have previously been viewed as violating states rights, but when you listen to the last video, schools were baited into it with Obama money. Apparently, experienced politicians with law background weren't able to hear the buzz word "common" to make them realize it was part of the communitarian/collectivist agenda. Yet again our globalist politicians pulled another one over the eyes of the American people.

Some specifics, please.
This is an example of what is within the curriculum of Common Core.

 
(YouTube link)

 How did this happen?
I'm not certain who this woman is, but she may be relaying information with limited knowledge of the Communitarian agenda. She states that Common Core was slipped in without our politicians knowing it, but I don't believe it for a minute. Presently, there is only a handful of states that have not applied to this date. The states who have not yet adopted Common Core can be viewed on their website.

In the video, she reveals a list of globalist names who are deeply imbedded as funders in the Common Core's program. She explains that this is about having world knowledge in the global economy.


(YouTube link)

Conclusion
This generation of young people are being molded to run the world government and accept collectivist ideology. I suspect that since some homeschoolers are not being indoctrinated with the collectivist ideologies, homeschooling will either become illegal or they will be required to use the curriculum over the internet.

Can we fight against it? No, because world government is something we know is in our future, based upon the scriptures. However, knowledge of this will allow us to position ourselves to deal with what is coming down the pike.

If you don't believe Common Core has evil intentions, then you need to do more research on the subject of Communitarianism. The powers that be believe that we must be an active member in the global community - and this is one way of doing it. The overall theme of this is about equality, but when it comes down to it - we aren't. There's always the ones in charge.

Related Posts
The Subtle Lies of Democracy 
Synarchism and Communitarianism: A Synthesis of Ideologies
Interdependence: The Wrong Solution, a Bad Idea
Communitarianism: In Transition to Collectivist Values
The One World Classroom and Education 2020

Common Purpose and Domestic Violence Intervention

Defining Terms

Public Shaming would formerly take place in the town square, and was a highly effective means of social control and incentive for conformity. Even when not strictly public, humiliation can still be a psychologically "painful" aspect of punishment because of the presence of witnessing peers, relatives, staff or other onlookers.[1]

Public shaming is also known as public humiliation, and it can take a number of forms. In the modern world we live in, "reintegrative shaming" is on the rise.

Reintegrative shaming is a communitarian response to crime. It is based on a theory that emphasizes the importance of shaming the offender, as a form of criminal punishment, and to eventually reintegrate them back into society. It holds that punishments should focus on the offender’s behavior, rather than on the offender. It uses the disapproval of friends, family, co-workers, and community leaders to confront them of their bad behavior. It gives a voice to victims and the victim's supporters, by shaming the criminal, thus making the offender accountable.

Reintegrative shaming is now being used as a strategy in substance and domestic violence intervention through the use of communitarian methods and policies.

Enter: Common Purpose

It's funny how octopus and spiders can be so different, yet they are so much alike. One lives on land, while the other lives at sea - but when it comes to how far-reaching they both are, they are similar.

This is how Common Purpose works. It is slowly creating a network whose purpose it is to develop the foundation for collectivist thinking. Introduced by its trained leaders, Common Purpose is knowingly engineering a Communitarian mindset so that the world government will become a natural extension of it. This is where subtle social reform is taking us.

Infiltrating Domestic Violence
Though it may not be apparent to most, the new style of domestic violence intervention, treatment and prevention are all based on communitarian theory and delivered by Common Purpose. It's not a secret, since they decided to call their program and website by the same name. This particular group is working through Boston, MA.

 From the website, note the statement they placed in bold letters:

The overriding goal of Common Purpose is to create safety — freedom from violence and fear — for the batterer's partner and children. Men explore the intent and roots of their abuse and learn alternative behavior. 

To continue - two of the six points of the agency's mission:

• public education about male violence
• participating in a coordinated community response including partnerships with police, battered women's shelters, mental health and substance abuse personnel, and child protective service workers.

If you look at where this program got their "Common Purpose" direction, it came from the 2010 Violence Against Women Act initiated by the Obama Administration. It is an "unprecedented coordination and cooperation across the entire government to protect victims of domestic and sexual violence and enable survivors to break the cycle of abuse." [1]

President Barack Obama, joined by Vice President Joe Biden, speaks at a Violence Against Women awareness event 
in the East Room of the White House, Oct. 27 2010.

Since the government believes that many of the men who were convicted of rape and abuse rarely changed their behavior after being released, government decided to take out the big gun. Thanks to the contribution of this Australian report,  educators have concluded that the reason why men rape and assault women is because of their natural inclination to dominate, control, and humiliate - which all leads to the degradation of women. They want the public to believe that men can't help themselves from being jerks, since they are men. This is what their studies have concluded... but is it true?

Do men naturally dominate? 

Since a greater degree of batterings occur in the confines of marriage, let's look to see if the Bible says it is the natural inclination of men is to dominate.

"Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee." Gen. 3:16

When the verse says, "he shall rule over thee," it doesn't mean domination; it's speaking of headship. Headship is the point of each of these verses, and often misunderstood to mean male domination.

 Eph 5:22-24; Col 3:18; Titus 2:5; 1 Peter 3:1-7; 1 Cor 11:3

Headship is actually a kinder, gentler form of what is being called male domination. 


Do woman desire to dominate?

In the area of biblical roles for men and women, the complementarian viewpoint believes that when the verse, "that thy desire shall be to thy husband," concerns the woman's desire to dominate. I have supported this viewpoint, but allow me to suggest another way to look at this verse. I'm suggesting another interpretation because the key players who advocate the complimentarian viewpoint are also involved in the Emergent Church and the political Right Wing of the apostate church.

As an alternative, this verse could actually be saying that women are naturally inclined to worship/idolize the men in their lives, and look to them for affirmation and provision both emotionally and spiritually to a fault. Put another way, apart from Christ, women are predisposed to looking to men to fulfill in them things that only God Himself can fill. Its only when men disappoint their women that they push them aside and try to do it for themselves, independent of their men. So, control tactics aren’t the manifestation of a desire to dominate the men in their lives. Women resort to manipulation and control, because they long to rest in the men in their lives.[2]   

As part of the curse, the "desire" for thy husband is the same word used in Gen. 4:7, when God told Cain that sin desired to have him. In this verse it means a desire to control.

 "If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him."

So, neither men or women are naturally inclined to dominate. But because of our sin nature and the "lack of love," it often leads some to a cold hardened heart. As a result of this "lack of love," it turns into authoritarianism, and it lies at the root of spouse and child abuse. (Men are also abused by their wives, but this is less talked about.) For more on this, read "Love of Many Shall Wax Cold."

Conclusion
The point of this post is that the whole premise for this Australian study is faulty. Abuse intervention is controlled by feminists who have a war waged against men. We can now see their globalist intentions by permitting themselves to be swallowed-up by Common Purpose. They aren't genuinely concerned with the welfare of the woman or their family - just the spread of a political agenda.

In the grander scheme of things, this collectivist world democracy/communitarianism plan is using Common Purpose  within every community - whether they capitalize the words or not. In this post-Christian era we live in, the government is beginning to aggressively take the place of God. As social groups form within the community, they are no longer accountable to their maker, rather the community/state/federal government their protector. It follows then that if you want to be a member of the group, you must give up your individual rights to gain protection of the group/government.

By the way, I'm not saying that reintegration shaming won't work. I'm just saying that their intentions aren't completely honorable.

Related Posts
Common Purpose and the Third Way
Communitarianism: Collectivist Values in Transition 
The Decline of Male Leadership
Submission: What it is and What it isn't
The Church and Feminism
Are Women Oppressed?
How the Women of Media Sell Discontent